CLINICAL STUDY

Comparative analysis of clinical diagnosis results with Test-kit results:

Sensitivity: 92.08%; (95%CI : 87.52%~95.07%)
Specificity: 97.89%; (95%CI : 95.90%~98.93%)
Total clinical coincidence rate: 95.88%. (95%CI : 93.94%~97.21%)

  • Sensitivity 92.08% 92.08%
  • Specificity 97.89% 97.89%
  • Total clinical coincidence rate 95.88% 95.88%

Comparative analysis of Test-kit results:

Positive coincidence rate: 92.06%; (95%CI : 86.01%~95.63%)
Negative coincidence rate: 82.89%; (95%CI : 79.17%~86.07%)
Total coincidence rate: 84.88%. (95%CI : 81.74%~87.56%)

  • Positive coincidence rate 92.06% 92.06%
  • Negative coincidence rate 82.89% 82.89%
  • Total coincidence rate 84.88% 84.88%

Accuracy rate (test performed on patients at Jinyintan Hospital, China)

Positive sample rate: 100% (160 of 160 samples)
Negative sample rate 98.07% (159 of 160 samples)

  • Positive sample rate: 100% (160 of 160 samples) 100% 100%
  • Negative sample rate 98.7% (159 of 160 samples) 98.07% 98.07%

Comparative analysis of clinical diagnostic results with results from the test-kit

The comparison of the detection by the test-kit of IgG and/or IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 compared with the clinical diagnostic results is shown in the following table:

Sensitivity: 92.08%; (95%CI : 87.52%~95.07%)

Specificity: 97.89%; (95%CI : 95.90%~98.93%)

Total clinical coincidence rate: 95.88%. (95%CI : 93.94%~97.21%)

  clinical diagnosis resultsTotal
confirmed diagnosisexclusion
Test reagent
results
Positive (+)1868194
Negative (-)16372388
Total number202380582

The comparison of the detection by the test-kit of IgG and/or IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 compared with the nucleic acid test results is shown in the following table:

  Nucleic acid test resultsTotal
Positive (+)Negative (-)
Test reagent
results
Positive (+)11678194
Negative (-)10378388
Total number126456582

Positive coincidence rate: 92.06%; (95%CI : 86.01%~95.63%)

Negative coincidence rate: 82.89%; (95%CI : 79.17%~86.07%)

Total coincidence rate: 84.88%. (95%CI : 81.74%~87.56%)

Comparison of the first positive detection point detected by the test-kit of IgG and/or IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 compared with the nucleic acid test. The comparison is based on continuous sample collection from the same patients at different time points. The comparison is shown in the following table:

The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the detaction reagent and the clinical diagnosis results.

Test reagent resultsNumber of casesPercentage
Earlier than the nucleic acid test results315%
Same as the nucleic acid test results1470%
Later than the nucleic acid test results315%

The comparisons above show that there were no statistical significantly differences between the test-kit and the clinical diagnostic results.